What is Citizen and Nation ? Explained

Cit­i­zen

The con­cept of nation state award in the mod­ern peri­od. One of the ear­li­est asser­tions regard­ing the so vir­gin­i­ty of the nation-state and demo­c­ra­t­ic rights of cit­i­zen was made by the rev­o­lu­tion ories in France in 1789 .

Advertisement — TillExam
YouTube

Subscribe on YouTube

Get free tutorials, exam tips & updates.

Subscribe
WhatsApp

Join WhatsApp Channel

Stay updated with instant alerts.

Follow
Mock Test

Free SSC Mock Tests

Boost your preparation with free practice tests.

Start Now
Job Alerts

Govt Job Alerts

Get free daily updates on government jobs.

Get Alerts

Nation states claim that their bound­aries define not just a ter­ri­to­ry but also unique cul­ture and shared history. 

The nation­al iden­ti­ty may be expressed through sym­bols like a flag nation­al anthem nation­al lan­guage of cer­tain cer­e­mo­ni­al prac­tices among oth­er things. Most mod­ern state include peo­ple of dif­fer­ent reli­gions lan­guages and cul­tur­al tra­di­tions. But the nation­al iden­ti­ty of a demo­c­ra­t­ic state is sup­posed to pro­vide cit­i­zens with a polit­i­cal iden­ti­ty that can be shared by all the mem­bers of the state. Demo­c­ra­t­ic States usu­al­ly try to define The Iden­ti­ty so that it is as inclu­sive as pos­si­ble. That is which allows all cit­i­zens to iden­ti­fy them­selves as a part of the nation. But in prac­tice most coun­tries tend to define their iden­ti­ty in a way which makes it is eas­i­er for some cit­i­zens to iden­ti­fy with the state than oth­ers. It may also make it eas­i­er for the state to extend and cit­i­zen­ship to some peo­ple and some not. This would be as true of the Unit­ed States which prides itself on a being a coun­try of immi­grants as any oth­er coun­try France for instance is a coun­try which claims to be both sec­u­lar and inclu­sive. It includes not only paper of Euro­pean ori­gin but also cit­i­zens who orig­i­nal­ly came from oth­er areas such as North Africa .

Cul­ture and lan­guages are impor­tant fea­tures of its nation­al iden­ti­ty and all cit­i­zens are expect­ed to assim­i­late into it in the pub­lic aspects of their life .

They may how­ev­er retain their per­son­al beliefs and prac­tices in their pri­vate lives. 

This may seem like a rea­son­able pol­i­cy but it is not always sim­ple to define what is pub­lic and what is pri­vate and this has giv­en rise to some controversies. 

Reli­gious belief is sup­posed to belong to the pri­vate sphere of the cit­i­zen but some­times reli­gious sym­bols and prac­tices may enter into their pub­lic life .

We may have heard about the demand of Sikh school boys in France to wear the Tur­ban to school and of Mus­lim girls to wear the head scarf with their school uniform. 

This was dis­al­lowed to buy some schools on the ground that it involved bring­ing reli­gious sym­bols into the pub­lic sphere of state education. 

Those whose reli­gions did not demand such prac­tices nat­u­ral­ly did not face the same prob­lem. Clear­ly assim­i­la­tion into the nation­al cul­ture would be eas­i­er for some groups than for others. 

The cri­te­ria for grant­i­ng cit­i­zen­ship to new appli­cants varies from coun­try to country .

In coun­tries such as Israel or Ger­many fac­tors like reli­gion or eth­nic ori­gin may be giv­en pri­or­i­ty when grant­i­ng citizenship. 

Cul­ture

In Ger­many there has been a per­sis­tent demand from Turk­ish work­ers who were at one time encour­aged to come and work in Ger­many that their chil­dren who have been born and brought up in Ger­many should auto­mat­i­cal­ly be grant­ed citizenship. 

This is still being debat­ed .There are only a few exam­ple of the kinds of restric­tions which may be placed on cit­i­zen­ship even in demo­c­ra­t­ic coun­tries which Pride them­selves on being inclusive. 

India defines itself as a sec­u­lar demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation state the move­ment for Inde­pen­dence was a broad based on and delib­er­ate attempts were made to bind togeth­er peo­ple of dif­fer­ent reli­gions rea­sons and cultures .

True,partition of the coun­try did take place in 1947 when dif­fer­ences with the Mus­lim League could not be resolved but this only strength­ened the resolve of Indi­an nation­al lead­ers to main­tain the sec­u­lar and inclu­sive char­ac­ter of the Indi­an nation state they were com­mit­ted to build. 

This resolvers embed­ded in the constitution. 

The Indi­an Con­sti­tu­tion attempt­ed to accom­mo­date a very diverse society. 

To men­tion just a few of these diver­si­ty is it attempt­ed to pro­vide full and acquire cit­i­zen­ship to groups as dif­fer­ent are sched­uled caste and Sched­uled Tribes many women who had not pre­vi­ous­ly enjoyed equal rights some remote com­mu­ni­ties in the Andaman and Nico­bar Islands who had lit­tle con­tact with mod­ern Civ­i­liza­tion and many others. 

It also attempt­ed to find a place for the coun­try it had to pro­vide equal rights to all with­out at the same time forc­ing peo­ple to give up their pro­fes­sion­al beliefs lan­guages are cul­tur­al practices. 

It was there­fore a unique exper­i­ment which was under­tak­en through the constitution. 

The Repub­lic Day parade in Del­hi sym­bol­is­es the attempt of the state to include peo­ple of dif­fer­ent rea­sons cul­tures and religions. 

The pro­vi­sions about cit­i­zen­ship in the con­sti­tu­tion can be found in the path of to and in sub­se­quent laws passed by parliament. 

The con­sti­tu­tion adopt­ed and essen­tial­ly demo­c­ra­t­ic and inclu­sive notion of citizenship. 

In India cit­i­zen­ship can be acquired by birth decent reg­is­tra­tion nat­u­ral­iza­tion for inclu­sion of territory. 

The rights and oblig­a­tions of cit­i­zens are list­ed in the constitution. 

There is also a pro­vi­sion that the state should not dis­crim­i­nate against cit­i­zens on Grounds only of reli­gion race ‚caste, sex ‚place of birth or any of them. 

The rights of reli­gious and lin­guis­tic minori­ties are also protected. 

How­ev­er ‚even such inclu­sive pro­vi­sions have giv­en rise to strug­gles and controversies. 

The wom­en’s move­ment the dalit move­ment or strug­gles of peo­ple dis­placed by devel­op­ment projects rep­re­sent only a few of the strug­gle being waste by peo­ple who feel that they are being the night full rights of citizenship. 

The expe­ri­ence of India indi­cates that demo­c­ra­t­ic cit­i­zen­ship in any coun­try is a project and ide­al to work towards. 

New issues are con­stant­ly being raised as soci­ety is changed and new demands are made by groups who feel that they are being marginalised. 

In a demo­c­ra­t­ic state these demands have to be negotiated. 

Share this:
Scroll to Top