Money Laundering — Meaning, Stages, Punishment

The practise of hiding criminal proceeds and incorporating them into the legitimate financial system is known as money laundering. It is difficult for criminals to use illicit money before proceeds of crime are laundered because they cannot explain where it came from and it is simpler to trace it back to the crime. It is difficult to identify money from genuine financial resources after it has been laundered, and the cash might be used by criminals without being detected.

  • Save
Mon­ey Laundering

How Does Money Laundering Work?

There are count­less ways to laun­der mon­ey. Gen­er­al­ly, mon­ey laun­der­ing can be bro­ken down into three stages:

  • Save
Mon­ey Laun­der­ing Stages
  • Place­ment – the ini­tial entry of illic­it mon­ey into the finan­cial system
  • Lay­er­ing – the process of sep­a­rat­ing the funds from their source, often using anony­mous shell companies
  • Inte­gra­tion – the mon­ey is returned to the crim­i­nal from legit­i­mate-look­ing source.

Where Do Banks Come In?

Mon­ey laun­der­ing near­ly invari­ably involves pass­ing it through one or more banks, the prin­ci­pal defence tac­tic is to force banks to do par­tic­u­lar checks and mon­i­tor trans­ac­tions to ensure that their accounts are not being used for mon­ey laun­der­ing. Fol­low­ing a high-risk trans­ac­tion, they may be required to file a sus­pi­cious activ­i­ty report (SAR) with police enforce­ment. They may refuse to do busi­ness with a dubi­ous client in extreme instances.

Mon­ey laun­der­ing scan­dals have engulfed a num­ber of high-pro­file West­ern banks in recent years. HSBC, for exam­ple, acknowl­edged to break­ing the Bank Secre­cy Act by fail­ing to super­vise over $200 tril­lion in wire trans­fers between its Mex­i­can and US busi­ness­es, among oth­er things. The Sinaloa and Norte de Valle drug car­tels were revealed to have trans­port­ed $881 mil­lion in drug mon­ey through HSBC-accounts Mex­i­co’s to HSBC-USA via unmon­i­tored wire transactions.

What about Trade-Based Money Laundering?

To trans­port huge amounts of illic­it mon­ey between nations, sophis­ti­cat­ed crim­i­nal groups fre­quent­ly use trade-based mon­ey laun­der­ing, which can also include trade mis­in­voic­ing. Laun­der­ers can con­ceal the ulti­mate source of illic­it funds by mix­ing the pro­ceeds of crime with the pro­ceeds of legit­i­mate enter­prise. In the Lebanese-Cana­di­an Bank case, for exam­ple, a world­wide nar­cotics mon­ey laun­der­ing enter­prise linked to Hezbol­lah mixed pro­ceeds from used car sales in Europe with pro­ceeds from cocaine sales in Africa.

What Does GFI Recommend We Do about Money Laundering?

Many of GFI’s pol­i­cy pro­pos­als, such as remov­ing anony­mous shell firms and address­ing trade mis­in­voic­ing, will make it more dif­fi­cult for crim­i­nals to laun­der mon­ey, which means they will make it more dif­fi­cult for them to spend their mon­ey with­out being caught. In addi­tion, GFI offers a num­ber of pol­i­cy pro­pos­als for com­bat­ing mon­ey laundering:

  1. Make all felonies pred­i­cate offens­es for mon­ey laun­der­ing. In many coun­tries, cer­tain key crimes such as tax eva­sion can­not be the basis for a mon­ey laun­der­ing charge.
  2. Coun­tries should com­ply with all FATF stan­dards. Accord­ing to a 2013 OECD report, many FATF coun­tries are poor­ly com­pli­ant on key stan­dards designed to pre­vent mon­ey laundering.
  3. Bet­ter enforce exist­ing crim­i­nal laws. Bankers who know­ing­ly com­mit crimes and allow bank accounts to be used to shel­ter crim­i­nal mon­ey should be held per­son­al­ly account­able. To date, enforce­ment has gen­er­al­ly focused on mod­er­ate-sized fines and promis­es by banks to improve com­pli­ance. No bank should be “too big to jail.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Share via
Copy link
Verified by MonsterInsights